Soccer in smart cities
Venture Category: Sports
Community: Sensorica
Embedded Files
Objectives
Objectives
The main goal of this project is to bring sports back to human scale, to change the narrative and the culture around sports, by giving people the power to capture, distribute and engage with sports-related content. In order to reach this higher objective, we are assembling a family of technologies that allows streaming / recording of amateur team sports, with social interactivity.
Description
Description
This project is currently very active in Mexico
Open Mémoire Plan d’action du sport et du plein air urbains 2018-2028
Content
Content
Contents
Contents
Communication and coordination
Communication and coordination
Communication channels
Communication channels
Messaging: Discord channel - see if someone is in the voice channel.
For more generic discussions: Open forum, Main Sensorica mailing list
Social media: Sensorica Facebook page,
{add links to Verses Facebook page, Quebec Art Council Facebook Channel}
Coordination tools
Coordination tools
Web links, Diigo tag: smart_soccer
Planning
Planning
Open venture in NRP {URL}
Status:
May 11th, 2018 Engaging the City of Montreal by contributing to the public consultation ''Plan d’action du sport et du plein air urbains 2018-2028''
September 24th, 2018 meeting with Ville de Montreal, sports department, to propose this project as a pilot for a more participatory city. See meeting report.
Notes
click to open notesNotes
[you need to become a project affiliate to gain access to edit the website, in order to update these notes]
Migrated to new website recently.
Exploring this project as a content-based open and collaborative enterprise.
Documentation repository
Documentation repository
Incentives
Incentives
Describe all layers of incentives...
Economic model
Economic model
The short-term economic model for this venture is based mostly on public funding and crowdfunding.
The long-term economic model for this venture is built around open innovation and distributed manufacturing (DIY).
In short, for the long run, we're geared towards providing:
DIY kits (can be transactional kit sales) that provide required vitamins (non-digitally manufactured components) to build a particular tool (Zimmermann, 2014; Gibney, 2016).
Specialty parts / components, hard-to-find, custom (ex. BackYard Brains or OpenQCM both sell the most specialized and hardest to source components for their respective open hardware tools).
Help with calibrating and validating (scientific) hardware (can be transactional service) to provide security to prosumers who build their own tools. This provides prosumers with the confidence that their measurements or functionality are acceptably reproducible, accurate and precise.
Education / Training (ex. Open Source Ecology), include support. This can also follow the consulting business model (Fjelsted et al., 2012).
Ecosystem services: provide trust, validation, discoverability, help, a place to discuss and collaborate, etc.
------------------------------------------------------
More on p2p economic models
VENTURES are COLLABORATIVE, TRANSPARENT (anyone has access to the information that they produce) and OPEN (anyone can participate). They only produce deliverables based on OPEN SOURCE technology. VENTURES have a CUSTODIAN that represents them legally and acts as a trust for their tangible assets. VENTURES can have multiple EXCHANGE FIRMS, which are commercial entities that move products and services developed by VENTURES on the MARKET. EXCHANGE FIRMS oblige themselves by contract with the CUSTODIAN to share PROFIT with all contributors to VENTURES, from which they commercialize PRODUCTS.
Open Project governance document
[Instruction: link to governance doc, use template to create governance - delete this after]Organizational context
Organizational context
Agreements
Agreements
Custodian Agreement [provide link]
Exchange Firm Agreement [provide link]
Project Governance Template [provide link]
Page updated
Google Sites
Report abuse