3D printed microfluidics
Venture Category: Scientific Instruments
Community: Sensorica
This venture is looking for an animator and funding.
Design and build the quality control and certification infrastructure for the emerging glocal food system.
Build a network around bio-chemical sensing.
The ultimate goal is to put in place a modular lab-on-a-chip sensor technology/platform for testing and certification, based on an open standard that remains to be defined. This system can be integrated with peer-to-peer markets for distribution of agricultural products and food.
Toxicity and quality testing, certification (food and others)
Soil characterization
Water quality testing
We are building an ecosystem of and independent hardware hackers to work on lab-on-a-chip for bio-chemical detection.
SENSORICA Montreal in-house development
Microfabrication, open document
Silver coating, open document
Fluid level sensor - micron scale, open video
Short-term goals
Articulate a vision for the future of the food system, its infrastructure, quality control system
Translate the vision and actual needs into technical requirements, brake it down into individual projects that can be distributed to different research labs based on their specialization.
Build a network of research labs for bio-chemical sensing and lab-on-a-chip technology.
Long-term goals
Design (or adopt/adapt an existing one) a standard for quality control and certification for the future food system.
Design a modular lab-on-a-chip -based quality testing and certification platform.
Design and build individual quality test modules suited for specific applications, start with high value applications.
Milestones
Write the vision document
Build a network and get a collaboration grant for innovation and tech transfer.
Background
We used a B9Creator 3D printer and a soft polymer Spot-E elastic. We made 4 iterations of a simple design (see them on 3DWarehouse, and Thingiverse). The main goal is to estimate the potential of 3D printers in lab-on-a-chip prototyping. The channels are only 200 microns wide and 100 microns deep.
Usually, microfluidic devices are made of PDMS with a glass cover on top. The PDMS is patterned using a master silicon wafer, which itself is patterned using VERY expensive techniques (chemical etching, laser and ion beam ablation, etc.), requiring clean rooms and highly skilled individuals. A one-step 3D printing method for prototyping would dramatically reduce the development costs and time. For example, we had 4 iterations of the same design within only 2 hours, based on feedback from water-based fluid propagation tests as seen in the video below.
Problems with this first trial: some linkage outside of the channel due to surface imperfections. We are now trying thermal post-treatment, chemical post-treatment, and new mechanical designs with better seals.
We believe that 3D printing has the potential to bring lab-on-a-chip in everyone's garage or to a fab lab near you.
NOTE: we are also launching a project for a micro 3D printer, contact us to know more or to get involved.
Status: Talking with researchers, engaging existing local food networks to understand how they operate and to get them formulate their actual and future needs in terms of testing and certification.
Needs
Bio- chemical sensing, optics, photonics, microfluidics, lab-on-a-chip, microfabrication...
Network building
Technical writing and grant writing
Office tasks and coordination
Diigo (tag lab-on-a-chip) | Photos | Videos
Lab-on-a-chip
Micro-fabrication experiments
Sources of revenue: Short-term we count on research grants. Longer term we'll count on the distribution of solutions and associated ecosystem services. Crowdfunding for smaller projects of prototyping are also an option.
Access to built capital and social capital: we are planning to integrate at least 5 University labs from Quebec, Ontario and Ohio USA.
First-hand access to co-developed knowledge and know how.
See Sensorica's Business Model.
The short-term economic model for this venture is based mostly on public funding and crowdfunding.
The long-term economic model for this venture is built around open innovation and distributed manufacturing (DIY).
In short, for the long run, we're geared towards providing:
DIY kits (can be transactional kit sales) that provide required vitamins (non-digitally manufactured components) to build a particular tool (Zimmermann, 2014; Gibney, 2016).
Specialty parts / components, hard-to-find, custom (ex. BackYard Brains or OpenQCM both sell the most specialized and hardest to source components for their respective open hardware tools).
Help with calibrating and validating (scientific) hardware (can be transactional service) to provide security to prosumers who build their own tools. This provides prosumers with the confidence that their measurements or functionality are acceptably reproducible, accurate and precise.
Education / Training (ex. Open Source Ecology), include support. This can also follow the consulting business model (Fjelsted et al., 2012).
Ecosystem services: provide trust, validation, discoverability, help, a place to discuss and collaborate, etc.
------------------------------------------------------
More on p2p economic models
Open Venture governance document
[Instruction: link to governance doc, use template to create governance - delete this after]Network/Community: ...
Custodian: ...
Exchange firm: ...
Custodian Agreement [provide link]
Exchange Firm Agreement [provide link]
Venture Governance Template [provide link]